Spatial orientation of gynoecium in legumes and beyond: Commentary to the paper of Wang et al. (2021)
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
The third largest angiosperm family, Leguminosae, exhibits a relatively wide range of variation in morphology of gynoecium. Some of gynoecial patterns found in this taxon are of special interest, as they resemble ones previously described in the earliest angiosperms. The different orientations of carpels in legumes appear easily switchable through changes in flower symmetry and floral meristem sizes. Regardless of orientation of a single carpel with respect to the inflorescence axis, the placenta-bearing suture invariably remains adaxial as related to the floral axis. This conclusion relaxes the existing controversies between the supposed megasporo-phyll-derived nature of the carpel and observed diversity of placentation in known Mesozoic angiosperms.
Ključne reči:
angiosperms / inflorescence / carpel / monosymmetry / placenta / polysymmetryIzvor:
Botanica Pacifica, 2021, 10, 2, 83-86Izdavač:
- Vladivostok : Botanical Garden-Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
FiVeRTY - JOUR AU - Sinjushin, Andrey PY - 2021 UR - http://fiver.ifvcns.rs/handle/123456789/3526 AB - The third largest angiosperm family, Leguminosae, exhibits a relatively wide range of variation in morphology of gynoecium. Some of gynoecial patterns found in this taxon are of special interest, as they resemble ones previously described in the earliest angiosperms. The different orientations of carpels in legumes appear easily switchable through changes in flower symmetry and floral meristem sizes. Regardless of orientation of a single carpel with respect to the inflorescence axis, the placenta-bearing suture invariably remains adaxial as related to the floral axis. This conclusion relaxes the existing controversies between the supposed megasporo-phyll-derived nature of the carpel and observed diversity of placentation in known Mesozoic angiosperms. PB - Vladivostok : Botanical Garden-Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences T2 - Botanica Pacifica T1 - Spatial orientation of gynoecium in legumes and beyond: Commentary to the paper of Wang et al. (2021) EP - 86 IS - 2 SP - 83 VL - 10 DO - 10.17581/bp.2021.10207 ER -
@article{ author = "Sinjushin, Andrey", year = "2021", abstract = "The third largest angiosperm family, Leguminosae, exhibits a relatively wide range of variation in morphology of gynoecium. Some of gynoecial patterns found in this taxon are of special interest, as they resemble ones previously described in the earliest angiosperms. The different orientations of carpels in legumes appear easily switchable through changes in flower symmetry and floral meristem sizes. Regardless of orientation of a single carpel with respect to the inflorescence axis, the placenta-bearing suture invariably remains adaxial as related to the floral axis. This conclusion relaxes the existing controversies between the supposed megasporo-phyll-derived nature of the carpel and observed diversity of placentation in known Mesozoic angiosperms.", publisher = "Vladivostok : Botanical Garden-Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences", journal = "Botanica Pacifica", title = "Spatial orientation of gynoecium in legumes and beyond: Commentary to the paper of Wang et al. (2021)", pages = "86-83", number = "2", volume = "10", doi = "10.17581/bp.2021.10207" }
Sinjushin, A.. (2021). Spatial orientation of gynoecium in legumes and beyond: Commentary to the paper of Wang et al. (2021). in Botanica Pacifica Vladivostok : Botanical Garden-Institute, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences., 10(2), 83-86. https://doi.org/10.17581/bp.2021.10207
Sinjushin A. Spatial orientation of gynoecium in legumes and beyond: Commentary to the paper of Wang et al. (2021). in Botanica Pacifica. 2021;10(2):83-86. doi:10.17581/bp.2021.10207 .
Sinjushin, Andrey, "Spatial orientation of gynoecium in legumes and beyond: Commentary to the paper of Wang et al. (2021)" in Botanica Pacifica, 10, no. 2 (2021):83-86, https://doi.org/10.17581/bp.2021.10207 . .