Sampling Error in Relation to Cyst Nematode Population Density Estimation in Small Field Plots

2017
Authors
Župunski, Vesna
Jevtić, Radivoje

Spasic-Jokić, Vesna
Župunski, Ljubica
Lalošević, Mirjana

Ćirić, Mihajlo

Ćurčić, Živko

Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Cyst nematodes are serious plant-parasitic pests which could cause severe yield losses and extensive damage. Since there is still very little information about error of population density estimation in small field plots, this study contributes to the broad issue of population density assessment. It was shown that there was no significant difference between cyst counts of five or seven bulk samples taken per each 1-m(2) plot, if average cyst count per examined plot exceeds 75 cysts per 100 g of soil. Goodness of fit of data to probability distribution tested with chi(2) test confirmed a negative binomial distribution of cyst counts for 21 out of 23 plots. The recommended measure of sampling precision of 17% expressed through coefficient of variation (cv) was achieved if the plots of 1 m(2) contaminated with more than 90 cysts per 100 g of soil were sampled with 10-core bulk samples taken in five repetitions. If plots were contaminated with less than 75 cysts per 100 g of soil, 10-core b...ulk samples taken in seven repetitions gave cv higher than 23%. This study indicates that more attention should be paid on estimation of sampling error in experimental field plots to ensure more reliable estimation of population density of cyst nematodes.
Keywords:
cyst nematodes / detection / Heterodera schachtii / population density / small field plotsSource:
Journal of Nematology, 2017, 49, 2, 150-155Publisher:
- Society of Nematologists
Funding / projects:
DOI: 10.21307/jofnem-2017-059
ISSN: 0022-300X
WoS: 000405289400007
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85023166053
Collections
Institution/Community
FiVeRTY - JOUR AU - Župunski, Vesna AU - Jevtić, Radivoje AU - Spasic-Jokić, Vesna AU - Župunski, Ljubica AU - Lalošević, Mirjana AU - Ćirić, Mihajlo AU - Ćurčić, Živko PY - 2017 UR - http://fiver.ifvcns.rs/handle/123456789/1708 AB - Cyst nematodes are serious plant-parasitic pests which could cause severe yield losses and extensive damage. Since there is still very little information about error of population density estimation in small field plots, this study contributes to the broad issue of population density assessment. It was shown that there was no significant difference between cyst counts of five or seven bulk samples taken per each 1-m(2) plot, if average cyst count per examined plot exceeds 75 cysts per 100 g of soil. Goodness of fit of data to probability distribution tested with chi(2) test confirmed a negative binomial distribution of cyst counts for 21 out of 23 plots. The recommended measure of sampling precision of 17% expressed through coefficient of variation (cv) was achieved if the plots of 1 m(2) contaminated with more than 90 cysts per 100 g of soil were sampled with 10-core bulk samples taken in five repetitions. If plots were contaminated with less than 75 cysts per 100 g of soil, 10-core bulk samples taken in seven repetitions gave cv higher than 23%. This study indicates that more attention should be paid on estimation of sampling error in experimental field plots to ensure more reliable estimation of population density of cyst nematodes. PB - Society of Nematologists T2 - Journal of Nematology T1 - Sampling Error in Relation to Cyst Nematode Population Density Estimation in Small Field Plots EP - 155 IS - 2 SP - 150 VL - 49 DO - 10.21307/jofnem-2017-059 ER -
@article{ author = "Župunski, Vesna and Jevtić, Radivoje and Spasic-Jokić, Vesna and Župunski, Ljubica and Lalošević, Mirjana and Ćirić, Mihajlo and Ćurčić, Živko", year = "2017", abstract = "Cyst nematodes are serious plant-parasitic pests which could cause severe yield losses and extensive damage. Since there is still very little information about error of population density estimation in small field plots, this study contributes to the broad issue of population density assessment. It was shown that there was no significant difference between cyst counts of five or seven bulk samples taken per each 1-m(2) plot, if average cyst count per examined plot exceeds 75 cysts per 100 g of soil. Goodness of fit of data to probability distribution tested with chi(2) test confirmed a negative binomial distribution of cyst counts for 21 out of 23 plots. The recommended measure of sampling precision of 17% expressed through coefficient of variation (cv) was achieved if the plots of 1 m(2) contaminated with more than 90 cysts per 100 g of soil were sampled with 10-core bulk samples taken in five repetitions. If plots were contaminated with less than 75 cysts per 100 g of soil, 10-core bulk samples taken in seven repetitions gave cv higher than 23%. This study indicates that more attention should be paid on estimation of sampling error in experimental field plots to ensure more reliable estimation of population density of cyst nematodes.", publisher = "Society of Nematologists", journal = "Journal of Nematology", title = "Sampling Error in Relation to Cyst Nematode Population Density Estimation in Small Field Plots", pages = "155-150", number = "2", volume = "49", doi = "10.21307/jofnem-2017-059" }
Župunski, V., Jevtić, R., Spasic-Jokić, V., Župunski, L., Lalošević, M., Ćirić, M.,& Ćurčić, Ž.. (2017). Sampling Error in Relation to Cyst Nematode Population Density Estimation in Small Field Plots. in Journal of Nematology Society of Nematologists., 49(2), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2017-059
Župunski V, Jevtić R, Spasic-Jokić V, Župunski L, Lalošević M, Ćirić M, Ćurčić Ž. Sampling Error in Relation to Cyst Nematode Population Density Estimation in Small Field Plots. in Journal of Nematology. 2017;49(2):150-155. doi:10.21307/jofnem-2017-059 .
Župunski, Vesna, Jevtić, Radivoje, Spasic-Jokić, Vesna, Župunski, Ljubica, Lalošević, Mirjana, Ćirić, Mihajlo, Ćurčić, Živko, "Sampling Error in Relation to Cyst Nematode Population Density Estimation in Small Field Plots" in Journal of Nematology, 49, no. 2 (2017):150-155, https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2017-059 . .